Demonstrates enhanced communication efficiency in UAV task allocation, suggesting improvements under stale information conditions.
Dynamic task allocation for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) is often constrained by stale and asymmetric information. Variants of the Consensus-Based Bundle Algorithm (CBBA) can waste bandwidth by transmitting every state or bid update without distinguishing assignment-altering information from irrelevant perturbations. This paper proposes Assignment-Consistent Dynamic Multi-UAV Task Allocation (AC-DMTA), a decision-centric framework in which agents communicate only when local uncertainty may invalidate the current assignment. AC-DMTA represents stale records with uncertainty sets and converts point bids into interval bids, enabling task-winner and bundle-stability certificates to suppress assignment-irrelevant messages. These certificates provide local sufficient conditions for certifying the stability of task-winner and bundle decisions within the modeled uncertainty envelopes and candidate sets, allowing assignment-irrelevant communication to be skipped. Timestamp and recency records further resolve asynchronous conflicts without broad resynchronization. Across four benchmark environments and 20 paired seeds, AC-DMTA sends fewer bytes and directed messages than periodic CBBA, Event-Driven Consensus-Based Bundle Algorithm (ED-CBBA), Clustered CBBA, and Two-Level Clustered Consensus-Based Bundle Algorithm (TLC-CBBA), achieving byte reductions of 10.4–91.1% across baseline–scenario pairs while maintaining competitive reward and task-completion rates. Under the tested delay and packet-loss stress conditions, AC-DMTA also achieves the lowest number of bytes per completed task among the compared methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: