Examines the association of trust and verification behaviour in students using generative AI for academic information, highlighting the need for credibility assessment.
Generative AI is increasingly used by students as a source of academic information, yet less is known about how they judge, verify, and rely on AI-generated content. Grounded in Source Credibility Theory and informed by information literacy and digital verification perspectives, this study examines associations among perceived credibility, trust, verification behaviour, and reliance. Survey data from 650 undergraduate and postgraduate students across four universities in Nepal were analysed using covariance-based structural equation modelling. Perceived credibility was positively associated with trust, while trust and verification behaviour were positively associated with reliance. The direct association between perceived credibility and reliance was not significant after trust was included, whereas the indirect association through trust was significant. Because the data are cross-sectional, this pattern is interpreted as an indirect association rather than causal mediation. The study positions generative AI as an academic information source requiring credibility judgement, verification, and cautious academic incorporation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sanjaya Pudasaini (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: