Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates particulate matter doses in urban parks, suggesting design strategies to enhance air quality perception.
Urban parks are widely regarded as healthy and sustainable urban infrastructures, yet their respiratory benefits depend on the coupling of design, behaviour, and perception rather than ambient PM concentrations alone. A multi-season daytime fair-weather panel study across five urban park space types integrated in situ PM monitoring, SOPARC-based behavior mapping (9173 users), dwell-time surveys, and inhalation-rate libraries to estimate per capita inhaled doses, while an on-site survey (n = 837) assessed perceived PM and its influence on space choice. Understory and water spaces exhibited the highest PM10 and TSP concentrations, whereas waterfront areas were the cleanest; winter concentrations were elevated but preserved the same space-type ranking. Sports spaces had the most intense activity profiles (61.9% moderate-to-extreme), and understory and sports spaces supported the longest stays, with little seasonal change in either intensity or duration. Consequently, per capita PM exposure was highest in sports and understory spaces and lowest in water and waterfront spaces. Spaces that attracted more users also delivered higher per capita doses, indicating an overlap between popularity and high-dose micro-environments. Perceptually, 94.9% of users rated PM as low or relatively low in water spaces, whereas squares had the highest share of “moderate or worse” ratings (26.4%); 78.1% chose locations based on perceived air quality, despite weak or even negative correlations with measured PM. These findings reveal a design-driven exposure architecture in which space configuration organizes both PM concentrations and user behavior, while misperception can steer visitors, especially in winter, toward the very park micro-environments that deliver the highest inhaled doses. This study provides evidence for exposure-aware park design and management that can reduce respiratory risk while supporting sustainable outdoor recreation and healthier urban living.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: