Key result
Post-angioplasty engagement is shaped by facility factors, trust, educational interactions, and financial barriers.
Why the study?
Limited research explores the multilevel determinants shaping doctor-patient engagement after angioplasty, particularly in resource-constrained settings like Iran.
Observational (n=24)
Yes
Doctor-patient engagement after angioplasty is shaped by facility, relational, educational, and financial factors, highlighting the need for holistic, equity-focused interventions to improve long-term adherence.
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are a leading global health burden, with coronary artery disease (CAD) often requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). While PCI improves survival, long-term outcomes hinge on post-procedural patient engagement, a multifaceted process influenced by individual, interpersonal, and systemic factors. Despite its importance, limited research explores the multilevel determinants of doctor-patient engagement in post-angioplasty contexts, particularly in resource-constrained settings like Iran. This study addresses this gap by exploring multilevel determinants shaping doctor-patient engagement in post-angioplasty contexts, distinguishing itself from prior qualitative studies (e.g., those focusing solely on lived experiences or cardiac rehabilitation perceptions in high-income countries) by integrating a game theory lens and examining socioeconomic disparities in an LMIC setting. A qualitative study was conducted in Mashhad, Iran, involving 24 post-angioplasty patients (mean age 50.17 years) purposively sampled from public and private hospitals. Semi-structured interviews explored treatment decision-making, follow-up challenges, and healthcare system interactions. Data were analyzed using thematic content analysis in MAXQDA 20, with intercoder reliability (κ = 0.92) and rigorous validation strategies like member checking and expert review. Four key determinants emerged: (1) Facility-related factors, where digital systems (e.g., online scheduling) enhanced engagement, but disparities between public and private hospitals created inequities; (2) Trust and satisfaction, built on physician accessibility, empathy, and professionalism; (3) Educational interactions, where multi-modal resources (e.g., videos, culturally tailored analogies) improved understanding, though health literacy gaps persisted; and (4) Financial barriers, including high out-of-pocket costs and insurance complexities, disproportionately affected marginalized groups. A game theory lens revealed cooperative interactions fostered adherence, while misaligned incentives led to disengagement. Doctor-patient engagement in post-angioplasty care is a dynamic interplay of structural, relational, and economic factors. Interventions must address these multilevel determinants holistically, such as investing in digital infrastructure, training providers in patient-centered communication, and implementing policy reforms to reduce financial barriers. The study underscores the need for culturally tailored, equity-focused strategies to optimize long-term outcomes. Future research should evaluate targeted interventions in diverse settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khodadadi et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease (post-angioplasty) (n=24). Post-angioplasty care factors was evaluated on Multilevel determinants of doctor-patient engagement. Doctor-patient engagement in post-angioplasty care is shaped by four key determinants: facility-related factors, trust and satisfaction, educational interactions, and financial barriers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: