Longitudinal case study links high-level capabilities to managerial practices in a competitive sector, indicating a new framework for analysis.
The dynamic capabilities perspective explains how firms sustain a competitive advantage in contemporary rapidly changing environments, yet it still lacks empirical accounts of how the three high-level capabilities of sensing, seizing, and transforming become observable processes through managerial practices. The study examines Thunder Tiger, a firm that developed into a leading global brand in the technologically dynamic and highly competitive radio-control model industry, and uses 30 strategic initiatives identified from its 36-year development trajectory as the units of analysis. Adopting the extended case method, we conduct simultaneous coding across two dimensions: the core content of high-level capabilities and observable managerial practices. We develop an analytical framework for dynamic capability processes comprising three layers: the three high-level capabilities, four functional domains, and twelve process items. Through this framework, we show how high-level capabilities can be linked to observable managerial practices in Thunder Tiger’s strategic initiatives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: