Retrospective study compares outcomes of Auryon laser and conventional recanalization in symptomatic in-stent occlusions, suggesting benefits of Auryon laser technique.
Background: Complete femoropopliteal in-stent occlusions remain technically challenging because durable treatment requires restoration of an intraluminal channel within the pre-existing stent scaffold. This study evaluated Auryon 355 nm laser-assisted recanalization compared with conventional endovascular recanalization in symptomatic patients with femoropopliteal in-stent occlusions. Methods: This retrospective single-center comparative study included patients treated with Auryon laser-assisted recanalization between May 2023 and June 2024 and a historical control group treated with conventional recanalization between January 2020 and April 2022. The prespecified primary endpoint was a conditional endpoint of 12-month primary patency among primary-strategy technically successful procedures. An exploratory full-cohort strategy-level analysis of 12-month durable technical success was also performed to account for initial technical failures. Results: Forty-four patients were analyzed: 18 in the Auryon group and 26 in the control group. Baseline clinical characteristics were broadly comparable, although selected anatomical and clinical imbalances were present. Post hoc sensitivity analyses were considered hypothesis-generating because of sparse events and wide confidence intervals. Primary-strategy technical success was significantly higher with Auryon-assisted recanalization than with conventional recanalization (94.4% vs. 65.4%, p = 0.031). In the conventional group, six of nine primary-strategy failures were subsequently recanalized after distal retrograde bailout puncture, yielding a descriptive final assisted recanalization rate of 88.5% (23/26). In the full-cohort strategy-level analysis, 12-month durable technical success was achieved in 83.3% of patients in the Auryon group and 50.0% in the control group (p = 0.030). Among primary-strategy technically successful procedures, 12-month primary patency was numerically higher after Auryon-assisted treatment (88.2% vs. 76.5%; log-rank p = 0.37), without statistically significant differences in patency-related secondary outcomes. No distal embolization or procedure-related complication occurred in the Auryon group. Conclusions: In this retrospective comparative experience, Auryon 355 nm laser atherectomy was associated with significantly higher primary-strategy technical success than conventional endovascular recanalization. Among successfully recanalized patients, 12-month patency-related outcomes were numerically favorable but not statistically significant. Larger prospective studies are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marzano et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: