Evaluates operational cleaner-performance using a prospect theory framework in the automotive industry, indicating strong performance among certain manufacturers.
This study evaluates the operational cleaner-production performance of automotive vehicle segments using a Prospect Theory-enhanced Data Envelopment Analysis (PTE-DEA) framework. The unit of analysis is defined from manufacturer-level decision-making units to manufacturer–vehicle segment-level decision-making units to capture heterogeneity across vehicle portfolios. Using the 2024 dataset, 50 decision-making units (DMUs) are considered, each of them represents a specific combination of manufacturer, regulatory class, and vehicle type. The selected inputs are vehicle weight, horsepower, and footprint, representing operational vehicle burdens, while the selected outputs are real-world MPG, real-world MPG city, and real-world MPG highway, representing fuel-efficiency-based cleaner-performance outcomes. The baseline PTE-DEA results indicate that Mazda (Sedan/Wagon), Subaru (Sedan/Wagon), Stellantis (SUV), Volkswagen (Sedan/Wagon), and Kia (Sedan/Wagon) form the leading segment-level group. Production-weighted manufacturer-level aggregation further shows that Subaru, Volkswagen, Nissan, Honda, Mazda, Toyota, and Kia demonstrate relatively strong portfolio-level cleaner-performance outcomes. Robustness analyses, including 600 behavioral parameter scenarios, rank-correlation assessment, and Monte Carlo perturbation, confirm that the leading segment-level patterns are generally stable. The study contributes to cleaner-production benchmarking by demonstrating how segment-level heterogeneity, behavioral assumptions, and fuel-efficiency-based operational indicators can be integrated into a more discriminative PTE-DEA framework. The findings provide a scenario-based decision-support perspective for automotive manufacturers and policymakers seeking to evaluate operational cleaner performance across heterogeneous vehicle segments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: