Examines the Mosul dispute post-WWI, highlighting Sheikh Mahmud's role amid Ottoman and British interests.
This study examines the international dispute over the vilayet (province) of Mosul after the First World War and the role of Kurdish leader Sheikh Mahmud Barzanji in this process. The research addresses the British Empire’s strategy of maintaining control over Iraq within the scope of its colonial policies and Turkey’s counter-argument that viewed Mosul as an integral part of Anatolia. The Mosul issue, which remained unresolved in the Treaty of Lausanne, was brought before the League of Nations and became a complex matter involving conflicting ethnic, political and economic interests in the region. The study analyzes in detail how Turkey and Britain instrumentalized the Kurdish issue to maintain their dominance over Mosul and examines Sheikh Mahmud’s stance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kılıç et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: