Shows the characteristics of an information channel in a multidimensional framework, suggesting implications for black hole information and quantum theories.
July 8th, 2026: Technical updates following the development of the Absolute Frame Theory. We characterize, in the language of quantum channel theory, the information interface between a four-dimensional observable manifold M and a higher-dimensional substratum A proposed in the Absolute Frame Theory. We show that the routing term of the interaction Lagrangian induces a completely positive trace-preserving map Φ: B(H_M) → B(H_A) whose effective output dimension is fixed by the action quantization axiom. We compute the four standard capacities of this channel—quantum capacity Q, classical capacity C, entanglement-assisted classical capacity C_E, and private classical capacity P—and show that each carries distinct physical interpretation: Q bounds the number of coherent pointers that can be sustained simultaneously, C bounds the rate of classical information transmissible from M to A, C_E − C quantifies the structural cost imposed by the thermodynamic isolation axiom, and P relates to the recoverability of information once transferred. We discuss the framework as a quantum-theoretic instantiation of a multidimensional informational substratum—a notion structurally related to the historical concept of aether but free of the empirical constraints that refuted its classical version. We show that the channel framework yields a natural resolution of the black hole information paradox: information transferred through Φ to the substratum is not destroyed by horizon formation, only made operationally inaccessible to observers confined to M. We discuss connections with holographic frameworks, implications for the macroscopic-classical transition, and the experimental signatures accessible through current quantum information platforms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patricio E. Valenzuela (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: