Evaluates sex estimation accuracy in Thai population, highlighting machine learning effectiveness.
< 0.01 with Cohens d ranging from 0.57 to 1.38. Length from tubercle to rib head with d = 1.38, distance from tubercle to internal margin with d = 1.17, and weight with d = 0.94 showed strongest discrimination. Comparative analysis revealed overall accuracy ranging from 75.2% to 81.0%. Random Forest achieved highest performance with 81.0% accuracy and AUC of 0.867 alongside 4.6% sex disparity. BLR demonstrated 80.3% accuracy with perfect balance showing 0% disparity, while DFA yielded 80.2% with 2.3% disparity. SVM underperformed at 75.2% with substantial bias of 19.0% disparity. This study provides the first validated sex estimation standards for Thai first rib morphometry. Binary logistic regression emerges as optimal for forensic application, balancing 80.3% accuracy, perfect sex-specific performance, and methodological transparency essential for legal proceedings, despite Random Forests marginally superior discriminatory capacity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duangchit et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: