Key result
Implementation of a broadly inclusive direct admission guideline increased the proportion of direct admissions from 12% to 18% without increasing intensive care transfers.
Why the study?
Direct admission bypasses the emergency department and offsets ED overload safely, motivating efforts to increase the proportion of unscheduled admissions admitted directly.
Does a broadly inclusive direct admission guideline increase the proportion of direct admissions in a children's hospital?
Observational
No
Does a broadly inclusive direct admission guideline increase the proportion of direct admissions in a children's hospital?
Implementation of a broadly inclusive direct admission guideline safely increased direct admissions and reduced ED length of stay for admitted patients.
Direct admission pathways safely reduce pediatric ED overload; extends Level 1 evidence to unscheduled admissions.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Direct admission (DA) to the hospital bypasses the receiving hospital’s emergency department (ED) and has been shown to offset ED overload without compromising patient safety. We aimed to increase the proportion of unscheduled admissions admitted directly. METHODS We tracked DA to our children’s hospital between January 1, 2021, and October 31, 2025. Interventions included centralization of unscheduled admissions within our Transfer Center, establishment of hospitalist attending oversight, and development of a DA guideline inclusive of all diagnoses, ages, and specialties. Interventions went live May 2023. Our primary outcome was the proportion of unscheduled admissions admitted directly, and our secondary outcome was ED length of stay (LOS) for patients admitted through the ED. Balancing measures included escalations of care within 6 hours, time to first clinical assessment, and hospitalization under 12 hours. We used descriptive statistics and statistical process control to assess the impact of our interventions. RESULTS DA increased from 12% preintervention to 18% postintervention without increasing intensive care transfers. During the same period, there was a sustained shift in ED LOS for admitted patients from 335 to 288 minutes. The median time to initial clinical assessment was 11 minutes faster for DA compared with ED admission (DA: 3 minutes, IQR 0–9 minutes vs ED: 14 minutes, IQR 7–30 minutes; P < .001). ED admissions were more likely to be hospitalized less than 12 hours (DA: 3.0% vs ED: 5.0%, P < .001). CONCLUSION A broadly inclusive DA guideline safely increased DA. Future work may explore adaptation within other health systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McDaniel et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Unscheduled hospital admissions. Direct admission guideline and centralization vs. Preintervention standard care was evaluated on Proportion of unscheduled admissions admitted directly. Implementation of a broadly inclusive direct admission guideline increased the proportion of direct admissions from 12% to 18% without increasing intensive care transfers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: