Key result
Adding social determinants of health to congenital heart surgery risk models modestly improves discrimination.
Why the study?
Does the inclusion of social determinants of health improve the predictive performance and discrimination of mortality risk models in patients undergoing congenital heart surgery?
Observational (n=10,271)
Yes
Does the inclusion of social determinants of health improve the predictive performance and discrimination of mortality risk models in patients undergoing congenital heart surgery?
Incorporating social determinants of health into congenital heart surgery risk models improves model discrimination and can meaningfully alter hospital performance evaluations.
Background: Despite documented associations between social determinants of health and outcomes post-congenital heart surgery, clinical risk models typically exclude these factors. Objectives: Characterize associations between social determinants and operative and longitudinal mortality; assess impacts on risk model performance. Methods: Demographic and clinical data were obtained for all congenital heart surgeries (2006–2021) from locally-held, CHS-COLOUR Society of Thoracic Surgeons-Congenital Heart Surgery Database (STS-CHSD) data. Neighborhood-level American Community Survey and composite sociodemographic measures were linked by ZIP code. Model prediction, discrimination, and impact on quality assessment were assessed before and after inclusion of social determinants in models based on the 2020 STS-CHSD Mortality Risk Model. Results: Of 14,173 total index operations across New York State, 12,321 cases, representing 10,271 patients at eight centers, had ZIP codes for linkage. 327 (2.7%) patients died in-hospital or before 30-days. 314 children died by 12/31/21 (total n=641, 6.2%). Multiple measures of social determinants of health explained as much or more variability in operative and longitudinal mortality than clinical comorbidities or prior cardiac surgery. Inclusion of social determinants minimally improved models’ predictive performance (operative: 0.834 to 0.844; longitudinal 0.808 to 0.811), but significantly improved model discrimination. 10.0% more survivors and 4.8% more mortalities changed risk quartile in appropriate directions. Wide variation in reclassification was observed by site, resulting in changes in center performance classification category for two of eight centers. Conclusions: While indiscriminate inclusion of social determinants in clinical risk modeling can conceal inequities, thoughtful consideration can help centers understand their performance across populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Crook et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Congenital heart surgery (n=10,271). Social determinants of health vs. Clinical risk models without social determinants was evaluated on Operative and longitudinal mortality model predictive performance. Including social determinants of health in congenital heart surgery risk models minimally improved predictive performance (operative: 0.834 to 0.844) but significantly improved model discrimination.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: