Key result
High discharge diuretic resistance risk is linked to ~79% higher 12-month mortality, regardless of torsemide.
Why the study?
It was unknown whether diuretic resistance risk, assessed using the BAN-ADHF score, associates with adverse post-discharge outcomes or modifies the treatment effects of torsemide versus furosemide.
Does torsemide compared to furosemide improve outcomes in patients discharged after heart failure hospitalization, and is this effect modified by diuretic resistance risk?
Cohort (n=2,421)
Does torsemide compared to furosemide improve outcomes in patients discharged after heart failure hospitalization, and is this effect modified by diuretic resistance risk?
Hazard Ratio: 1.79 (95% CI 1.45–2.21)
p-value: p=<0.001
High diuretic resistance risk (BAN-ADHF score ≥12) is associated with worse outcomes in heart failure patients post-discharge, but does not modify the comparative effectiveness of torsemide versus furosemide.
BAN-ADHF score stratifies post-discharge risk after HF hospitalization; confirms no differential efficacy of torsemide versus furosemide even among high-risk patients.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Among hospitalized patients with HF, diuretic resistance is associated with residual congestion, poor health status, and increased risk of HF hospitalization and mortality in the post-discharge period. The TRANSFORM-HF trial demonstrated no difference between torsemide and furosemide on clinical outcomes or quality-of-life following HF hospitalization. We assessed the association between diuretic resistance risk, assessed using the BAN-ADHF score, with risk of adverse outcomes among participants of the TRANSFORM-HF trial, and whether diuretic resistance risk modified the treatment effects of torsemide versus furosemide. METHODS: This post-hoc analysis of TRANSFORM-HF included participants randomized to torsemide or furosemide who survived to discharge with available BAN-ADHF scores. High diuretic resistance risk was defined as BAN-ADHF score ≥12 during index hospitalization. Associations of diuretic resistance risk with 12-month all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalization, and quality of life (KCCQ-CSS) were assessed using adjusted Cox models, and linear mixed-effects models, respectively. Treatment effect modification was assessed via interaction terms between randomized treatment and diuretic resistance risk status (high vs low). RESULTS: Among 2,421 participants (age:65 years, 62.9% male), 512 (21%) had high diuretic resistance risk. High diuretic resistance risk was associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality (aHR[95%CI]: 1.79[1.45-2.21], p<0.001), all-cause hospitalization (aHR: 1.34[1.15-1.55], p<0.001), and lower 12-month KCCQ-CSS improvement (-3.4 points, p=0.037). Diuretic resistance risk status did not modify the treatment effect of torsemide vs furosemide on all-cause mortality (pinteraction=0.54), all-cause hospitalization (pinteraction=0.74), or quality-of-life on follow-up (pinteraction>0.05 at each timepoint). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients discharged after HF hospitalization, higher diuretic resistance risk, assessed by the BAN-ADHF score, is associated with higher risk of mortality, HF hospitalization, and worse quality-of-life. Diuretic resistance risk status did not modify the treatment effects of torsemide versus furosemide.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Keshvani et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Heart failure (n=2,421). High diuretic resistance risk (BAN-ADHF score ≥12) vs. Low diuretic resistance risk was evaluated on 12-month all-cause mortality (aHR 1.79, 95% CI 1.45-2.21, p=<0.001). High diuretic resistance risk at discharge was associated with an increased risk of 12-month all-cause mortality (aHR 1.79; 95% CI 1.45-2.21; p<0.001) and did not modify the effect of torsemide.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: