Proposes a new educational model that connects literature and ecology, helping bridge the knowledge-action gap in environmental awareness.
The article’s single original insight is that Desuggestopedia’s three mechanisms—desuggestion, peripheral learning, and double-planedness—can be systematically repurposed as a proposed pedagogical framework that theorizes how narrative engagement may contribute to ecological identity and action, rather than merely to environmental awareness. Conventional environmental education’s over-reliance on cognitive-rational knowledge transfer generates a persistent knowledge-action gap. This article addresses that gap through the Eco-Desuggestopedic Model, which specifies how affective mechanisms operate structurally. Unlike diffuse calls for an ‘affective turn,’ the model provides a conceptual framework that generates empirically testable propositions for future research with defined mechanisms, scope conditions, and generative questions for empirical follow-up, advancing environmental education theory by providing the structural specificity the field has long called for.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vinnarasan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: