Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional analysis explores associations between substance use and mental health disorders across states, indicating variations.
Background: Substance use and co-occurring mental health disorders remain critical public health challenges in the Deep South, with substantial variation observed across states.Objective: This study examined the associations between substance use and co-occurring mental health disorders and explored state-level variations.Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 428,809 participants in the Deep South using the 2023 SAMHSA MH-CLD dataset. Multivariable regressions were used to assess the associations, with subgroup analyses examining state-level variation. Additionally, hierarchical regressions were used to provide a robust and sensitive evaluation of the primary finding.Results: The cohort was predominantly female (52.96%), White (51.36%), and aged 40–59 years (27.43%). Associations between substance use and mental health disorders varied significantly across Deep South states. In Louisiana, depression was most strongly associated with alcohol (aOR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.51–1.72) and cannabis use (aOR: 1.38, 95% CI:1.24–1.52), while in Alabama, opioid use showed the highest association with depression (aOR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.51–1.84). In Mississippi, cocaine use showed the strongest association with depression (aOR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.35–2.01). Bipolar disorder demonstrated the strongest links with substance use in Alabama, whereas personality disorder was most associated with cocaine in Louisiana (aOR: 3.72, 95% CI: 3.25–4.21), and opioid in South Carolina (aOR: 2.49, 95% CI: 2.25–2.65).Conclusion: Substance use and co-occurring mental health disorders varied significantly across Deep South states, highlighting the need for state-specific behavioral health strategies. Observed state-level variations may reflect differences in population characteristics, healthcare access, and behavioral health systems across the region.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmmad et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: