This manuscript proposes a speculative but operational interpretation in which mutual interference is treated as a primitive bookkeeping process behind phase, retained history, leakage, and observable readout. It does not replace quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, or information theory. Instead, it asks whether superposition, entanglement, decoherence, memory loss, and irreversible diffusion can be described as regimes of one information-interference process. Superposition is interpreted as concurrent read/write access to phase-addressed information; entanglement as shared interference structure across coupled histories; and decoherence as loss of recoverable separation when interference with external channels becomes too dense. A retained-history coordinate Γ is treated not merely as a stored past record, but as part of the internal structure of a phase flux. The manuscript includes a small information-flux network toy model as a conceptual illustration of recursive history update, self-organizing coupling, and observable history leakage. The model is not a quantum simulation: it contains no Hilbert-space dynamics, Born rule, unitary measurement model, or density-matrix formalism. Its purpose is to clarify the proposed audit language as an information-dynamical analogy.
Yoshida (Sat,) studied this question.