Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Assesses walking and cycling competitiveness in local transport, highlighting implications for policy and planning.
Active Mobility Accessibility Index (AMAI) quantifies the competitiveness of walking and cycling relative to driving using travel-time and distance ratios on identical sampled origin-destination pairs, reflecting network structure rather than destination choice. AMAI combines time parity and distance parity in a simple diagnostic score, using equal weights as a default specification for interpretation and policy use. Applied across the five Tyne and Wear local authorities, it demonstrates that cycling is more competitive than walking against driving. The median origin-level cycling AMAI is 0.820 and the median walking AMAI is 0.645. Parity remains limited where the share of origins at or above parity is 10.0% for cycling and 1.7% for walking. Initial API-based tests suggested that time-of-day effects are limited for the short local trips studied here, supporting development of a scalable in-house routing workflow for the main analysis. Validation against OA-level Census 2021 mode shares, with controls for terrain gradient and commute-distance composition, suggests that AMAI captures a relevant behavioural signal, while its main value lies in diagnosing local network competitiveness for policy and planning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Komar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: