Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Field experiment quantifies nutrient ratios in plant components and soils after 12 years of nitrogen fertilization and mowing, indicating management implications.
Nutrient stoichiometry provides a powerful framework for linking nutrient limitation to plant community biomass, especially in grasslands undergoing degradation in the agro-pastoral ecotone, where nitrogen (N) fertilization and mowing have become two widespread key management practices. However, their influence on nutrient stoichiometry has received little attention, especially beyond the leaf carbon (C):N:phosphorus (P) ratio. Here, we conducted a field experiment on the Mongolian Plateau wherein we quantified 19 nutrient ratios for soils and three plant components (aboveground plants, litter, and belowground roots) following 12 years of N addition (0, 2, and 10 g N m−2 year−1) combined with mowing, and grouped these ratios into four sets with C, N, P, and potassium (K) as the numerators. Under N addition, nutrient stoichiometry in plant components and soils changed markedly, whereas mowing management resulted in negligible changes in most C-, N-, and K-based nutrient ratios. Furthermore, mowing and N addition interactively and significantly affect P-based nutrient ratios. The responses of nutrient stoichiometry differed among plant components and soils, and also depended on the level of N input, and these ratios with C and N as numerators generally showed greater variability than those with P and K in the plant–soil system. Plant community biomass was associated with nutrient ratios in both plant components and in soils, although the relationships were not always significant. Long-term N addition resulted in rate-dependent shifts in nutrient stoichiometry, whereas mowing had only weak modifying effects. Extending nutrient stoichiometry framework (including neglected ratios, e.g., N:K) beyond leaf C:N:P to encompass entire plant–soil systems can help local government and ranch owners manage grasslands more cost-effectively because of simple assessment procedures, and could further provide more comprehensive insights into nutrient limitation and main hypotheses of ecological stoichiometry in grassland ecosystems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hasi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: