Background Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables en bloc resection of early gastrointestinal cancers and provides specimens suitable for precise pathological risk assessment. However, reporting remains variable for key parameters that determine curative resection and the need for additional treatment, including submucosal invasion depth and breadth, margin status, lymphovascular invasion, tumour budding, differentiation and use of ancillary stains. Objective To develop practical international standards for pathology assessment and reporting of invasive carcinoma in ESD specimens. Design An international panel of 42 experts, including 28 gastrointestinal pathologists and 14 therapeutic endoscopists from 15 countries, participated in a modified Delphi consensus process. Statements addressed measurement of invasion, margin assessment, staining, specimen handling, prognostic histological features and clinically relevant reporting. Results 56 recommendations reached consensus across seven domains. The panel recommends using Sm1–Sm3 subclassification only when the muscularis propria is present; otherwise, submucosal invasion depth should be reported in micrometres, rounded to the nearest 100 µm. Submucosal invasion breadth should be reported in millimetres as an adjunct metric for future validation. Margin positivity should be defined as direct tumour contact with the inked surface, supported by standardised pinning, inking, complete embedding and parallel sectioning. H&E remains the baseline stain, with selective immunohistochemistry or elastic stains for equivocal lymphovascular invasion, distorted architecture or difficult margin interpretation. Tumour budding should be reported according to International Tumour Budding Consensus Conference criteria, and differentiation, histological subtype, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion and margin status should be integrated into composite risk assessment. Conclusions These consensus standards provide immediately implementable, synoptic-ready pathology reporting criteria after ESD. By standardising measurement landmarks, margin terminology, ancillary stain use and reporting of adverse histological features, they aim to reduce interinstitutional variability, improve multidisciplinary decision-making and support future validation of risk models in early gastrointestinal cancer.
Khalaf et al. (Fri,) studied this question.