This article introduces a framework for studying hype's role in capitalism, highlighting its ethical implications.
This article contributes to the sociology of hype by introducing a novel framework which consists of four elements (systematicity, expectational orientation, temporal bracketing and non-deliverability). This approach contributes to a better understanding of how hype materializes and how it endures amid epistemic ambiguity. Drawing on examples from entrepreneurship as a contemporary case in point, we stress that hype is not value-neutral and requires propagators to justify collective welfare against individual failures. In turn, we develop a model of hype’s consequences in social settings emphasizing how hype around venturing normalizes ‘worthwashing’, a new concept capturing acts of distorted communication that sustain contested orders of worth in capitalism. This theorization bridges disparate views on hype, offering fresh insights into its ethical paradoxes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Poulis et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: