Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines the predictive value of AI and genomic scores for long-term outcomes in prostatectomy patients, indicating complementary insights for post-surgery care.
Background A multimodal AI (MMAI) model has been validated in prostate biopsy specimens to guide treatment intensification in men receiving radiation. The MMAI has been explored to an extent for prostatectomy patients and has not yet been examined in relation to established genomic scores. Methods We applied the MMAI biopsy model to a tissue microarray (TMA) of 424 prostatectomy cases with long-term follow-up. MMAI scores were derived from digitized pathology images and clinical variables. Associations with biochemical recurrence and metastasis were tested using logistic and Cox regression, adjusting for the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) and genomic cell cycle progression (CCP) scores. Results MMAI scores were generated from one TMA spot for each of 414 patients (98%). At 10 years, recurrence-free and metastasis-free survival were 74% and 96%, respectively. In univariable models, MMAI was significantly associated with BCR (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.06) and metastasis (HR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.07). MMAI was not independently prognostic after adjustment for CAPRA, but remained significant when adjusted for CCP. Correlation between MMAI and either CAPRA or CCP was modest (r < 0.35). The model combining MMAI and CCP achieved the highest discrimination for metastasis (c-index 0.76), comparable to CAPRA (c-index 0.75). Conclusions The MMAI score, originally developed for whole slide biopsy specimens, was prognostic when applied to a TMA of prostatectomy specimens despite not being designed for TMAs. Although not outperforming established clinical tools, it provided complementary information when combined with genomic data. The MMAI platform merits further refinement and validation in diverse clinical settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cooperberg et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: