Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reveals the effect of inhibitory balance on memory performance in spiking neural networks, indicating its importance for computational applications.
Recurrent neural networks are studied along two largely parallel tracks: as machine-learning models evaluated by task performance and as computational-neuroscience models of cortical circuits evaluated by dynamical realism. Reservoir computing offers a meeting point, yet the link between dynamical regime and computational performance has not been systematically mapped in biologically constrained spiking architectures. We treat the Brunel balanced excitatory–inhibitory network as a reservoir and characterize separation capacity (kernel quality) and transient memory (corrected linear memory capacity, validated by non-parametric mutual information) across the full phase diagram. The analysis uses a four-state Markov source whose Shannon entropy rate is set in closed form by a single parameter at fixed marginal entropy. Both capabilities increase monotonically with the inhibitory ratio g, remaining jointly highest in the asynchronous irregular regime, with diminishing increments consistent with eventual saturation; the synchronous irregular regime, despite a network timescale three orders of magnitude longer, supports neither. Memory further requires sparse input coupling: dense coupling collapses the driven timescale and erases memory in every regime. Inhibitory balance thus emerges as a unified architectural control parameter, providing a quantitative design criterion for cortical-circuit modeling and reservoir computing applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rosati et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: