Evaluates pigeon pea's effectiveness as a soybean substitute in tempe, indicating promising plant-based protein potential.
The demand for plant-based foods is increasing alongside growing public health awareness, while soybean availability in Indonesia remains limited due to reliance on imports. This study evaluated the potential of pigeon peas as a partial substitute for soybeans in tempe production. Tempe was produced using three soybean-to-pigeon pea ratios: 60:40 (F1), 50:50 (F2), and 40:60 (F3) in a completely randomized design. Physical characteristics, proximate composition, protein quality, and sensory attributes were analyzed. All formulations produced well-fermented tempe with uniform mycelial growth, a white surface color, and a compact texture, although higher pigeon pea substitution led to a darker interior color. Protein content ranged from 18.0 to 18.6%, meeting the national standard for tempe (≥15%), while fat content in F2 and F3 was below the standard (<7%). In-vitro protein digestibility was high (87.7–88.5%), and amino acid profiles were relatively complete; however, methionine was limiting, resulting in a low estimated PDCAAS (0.17–0.22). Sensory evaluation showed decreased panelist acceptance at higher substitution levels, while brightness, fresh aroma, and texture were significantly correlated with overall acceptance (p<0.01). In conclusion, pigeon pea–substituted tempe has potential as an alternative plant-based protein source, though the addition of complementary cereal is needed for the complementary protein effect.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nasution et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: