Multi-center study analyzes lesion volume's role as an independent predictor of recurrence in MRONJ, suggesting clinical significance.
Background/Objectives: To determine whether preoperative CT-measured lesion volume independently predicts surgical recurrence of MRONJ, and whether surgical approach influences recurrence after adjusting for lesion volume and clinical confounders. Methods: We conducted a retrospective multi-center cohort study of 1007 patients with single-lesion MRONJ who underwent surgery at five tertiary institutions in the Republic of Korea (2015–2023), with a minimum two-year follow-up. Preoperative lesion volume was measured by CT segmentation (Osteomyelitis Analyzer SW, version 2.0.6; Aemasue, Seoul, Republic of Korea) with cross-institutional consensus validation. Surgical recurrence was defined as re-fulfillment of 2022 AAOMS criteria after confirmed mucosal healing (Hayashida H1). Three logistic regression models of increasing adjustment were constructed a priori; reporting adhered to STROBE. Results: Recurrence occurred in 108 patients (10.7%) and increased in a dose–response pattern across volume quartiles (Q1 5.6%, Q2 9.2%, Q3 12.0%, Q4 16.0%; Cochran–Armitage trend Z = 3.89, p < 0.001), with a 2.9-fold relative gradient (absolute difference 10.4 percentage points). Surgeons preferentially selected aggressive approaches for larger lesions (OR = 1.651; 95% CI 1.338–2.037; p < 0.001). After adjustment, surgical approach was not an independent predictor in any model (fully adjusted OR = 0.735; 95% CI 0.381–1.419; p = 0.360), whereas lesion volume remained independent throughout (OR = 1.543–1.625 per log-unit; all p < 0.001; c-statistic 0.625–0.699). Conclusions: CT-measured preoperative lesion volume is an independent predictor of MRONJ surgical recurrence; we did not detect an independent surgical-approach effect, although the sample could not exclude a clinically meaningful one. Among measured factors, lesion volume—rather than surgical approach—was the principal predictor of recurrence risk, supporting consideration of routine CT volumetry in preoperative assessment, pending prospective validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ryu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: