Proof-Admissibility Boundary Note v0.6 defines boundary conditions for responsible proof terminology use, indicating key governance principles.
This record publishes Proof-Admissibility Boundary Note v0.6. The document presents a governance-oriented definition-of-definition framework for proof-admissibility under the OPF / Knowledge Governance / SFB research line. Its purpose is to define boundary conditions for the responsible public use of proof-related terminology before any mathematical proof claim is made. This publication does NOT claim: • theorem proof; • proof of the Riemann Hypothesis; • proof of the Yang-Mills Mass Gap; • proof of Navier-Stokes regularity; • formal verification; • peer review; • institutional approval; • external validation; • mathematical correctness confirmation. The release is provided together with SHA256 hashes and detached OpenPGP signatures for document integrity and provenance verification. Governance Boundary Peace.Non-violence.Dignity. NO military use.NO surveillance use.NO coercive use.NO weaponisation.NO unauthorised dual-use adoption. Audit-first.FACT-BASED.NO OVERCLAIM.NON-CIRCULARITY.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hisashi Suga (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: