PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 12, 2026Sciences of Pharmacy0 citationsOpen Access

Ancestral Heritage Toward Health Innovation: A Study of the Antibacterial Activity of Betel Leaf (Piper betle Linn.) Extract from the Betel-Chewing Tradition Against Oral Pathogenic Bacteria

NNNorhidayah NorhidayahSMSafira MazaNANovita Anggraeni

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate and compare the antibacterial effects of single betel leaf extract and traditional menginang extract against oral pathogenic bacteria.
  • Used a disk diffusion technique to assess antibacterial activity at concentrations of 12.5%, 25%, and 50%.
  • Compared the effects of menginang extract and single betel leaf extract against four oral pathogenic bacteria in vitro.
  • Employed one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc tests for data analysis.
  • The 50% menginang extract exhibited the strongest antibacterial activity with inhibition zones of 22.76 ± 1.38 mm to 28.22 ± 0.14 mm.
  • Statistical analysis showed significant differences (p < 0.05) in antibacterial activity compared to controls.
  • The results indicate that menginang extract's superior activity is potentially due to synergistic effects of its phytochemical components.

Abstract

Traditionally, menginang (a mixture of betel leaf, areca nut, gambir, and lime) has been used as a natural antibacterial agent. This study aimed to compare the antibacterial activity of single betel leaf extract and menginang extract against four oral pathogenic bacteria in vitro. This study compared the antibacterial activity of traditional menginang extract and single betel leaf extract against multiple oral pathogenic bacteria to evaluate their potential synergistic antibacterial effects. The experimental method used a disk diffusion technique at three concentrations (12.5%, 25%, and 50%), and the data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc tests. Chlorhexidine 0.2% was used as the positive control, while distilled water was used as the negative control. The 50% menginang extract showed the strongest antibacterial activity against all tested bacteria, with inhibition zones ranging from 22.76 ± 1.38 mm to 28.22 ± 0.14 mm, and the differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The inhibition zones produced by the 50% menginang extract were close to those of 0.2% chlorhexidine. The superiority antibacterial activity of menginang extract may be associated with synergistic interactions among alkaloids, phenolics, flavonoids, tannins, saponins, triterpenoids, and steroids identified during phytochemical screening. The menginang extract has high potential to be developed as an innovative natural product for oral health.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Norhidayah et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a5333754f7abc118adee1abhttps://doi.org/10.58920/sciphar0502667
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper