Key result
Flurpiridaz PET boosts CAD detection sensitivity by ~34% vs SPECT, but fails on specificity noninferiority.
Why the study?
Does Fluorine-18 flurpiridaz PET improve diagnostic accuracy for detecting coronary artery disease compared to technetium-99m SPECT in patients with known or suspected CAD?
RCT (n=795)
Blinded to clinical and ICA data
Yes
Does Fluorine-18 flurpiridaz PET improve diagnostic accuracy for detecting coronary artery disease compared to technetium-99m SPECT in patients with known or suspected CAD?
Fluorine-18 flurpiridaz PET provides superior sensitivity and overall discrimination for detecting CAD compared to Tc-99m SPECT, with lower radiation exposure, though its specificity was not non-inferior.
BACKGROUND Fluorine-18 flurpiridaz is a novel positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging tracer. OBJECTIVES This study sought to assess the diagnostic efficacy of flurpiridaz PET versus technetium-99m-labeled single photon emission computed tomography SPECT for the detection and evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD), defined as ≥50% stenosis by quantitative invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Flurpiridaz safety was also evaluated. METHODS In this phase III prospective multicenter clinical study, 795 patients with known or suspected CAD from 72 clinical sites in the United States, Canada, and Finland were enrolled. A total of 755 patients were evaluable, and the mean age was 62.3 ± 9.5 years, 31% were women, 55% had body mass index ≥30 kg/m2, and 71% had pharmacological stress. Patients underwent 1-day rest-stress (pharmacological or exercise) flurpiridaz PET and 1- or 2-day rest-stress Tc-99m-labeled SPECT and ICA. Images were read by 3 experts blinded to clinical and ICA data. RESULTS Sensitivity of flurpiridaz PET (for detection of ≥50% stenosis by ICA) was 71.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 67.0% to 76.3%), significantly (p < 0.001) higher than SPECT (53.7% [95% CI: 48.5% to 58.8%]), while specificity did not meet the prespecified noninferiority criterion (76.2% [95% CI: 71.8% to 80.1%] vs. 86.6% [95% CI: 83.2% to 89.8%]; p = NS). Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated superior discrimination of CAD by flurpiridaz PET versus SPECT in the overall population, in women, obese patients, and patients undergoing pharmacological stress testing (p < 0.001 for all). Flurpiridaz PET was superior to SPECT for defect size (p < 0.001), image quality (p < 0.001), diagnostic certainty (p < 0.001), and radiation exposure (6.1 ± 0.4 mSv vs. 13.4 ± 3.2 mSv; p < 0.001). Flurpiridaz PET was safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS Flurpiridaz PET myocardial perfusion imaging shows promise as a new tracer for CAD detection and assessment of women, obese patients, and patients undergoing pharmacological stress testing. A second phase III Food and Drug Administration trial is ongoing. (A Phase 3 Multi-center Study to Assess PET Imaging of Flurpiridaz F 18 Injection in Patients with CAD; NCT01347710).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maddahi et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Coronary artery disease (n=795). Fluorine-18 flurpiridaz PET vs. Technetium-99m-labeled SPECT was evaluated on Sensitivity for detection of ≥50% stenosis by ICA (p=<0.001). Fluorine-18 flurpiridaz PET demonstrated superior sensitivity for detecting CAD compared to SPECT (71.9% vs 53.7%; P<0.001), but its specificity did not meet the noninferiority criterion.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: