Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper introduces a framework for football player valuations, integrating Damodaran's valuation typologies and providing a decision framework for selecting the typology.Purpose/Rationale It aims to refine Damodaran's valuation typologies of intrinsic, relative, real options and probabilistic methods to football valuations, highlighting current limitations of using proxies and addressing the conflation between price and value.Design/Approach/Methodology The paper employs a conceptual analysis of a literature review, aiming to determine valuation typologies in the literature and their limitations, aligning the literature to the established typologies of Damodaran and provides a framework for using different valuation types.Findings While intrinsic valuations are robust in theory, their practical application faces challenges. Relative valuations are more pragmatic and contingent on standardised metrics. Real options and probabilistic approaches present potential for future research.Practical Implications The framework guides researchers and practitioners when to apply different valuation typologies within sport finance, offering insights for conducting comprehensive player valuations.Research Contribution This paper unifies existing valuation methods into a cohesive framework, filling methodological gaps and suggesting areas for further research in football player valuations.Originality/Value The paper's originality lies in integrating Damodaran's approaches with sports finance, offering valuable insights for both academic research and practical applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hill et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: