Key result
Among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and six or more comorbidities, apixaban and rivaroxaban were associated with a lower risk of stroke or systemic embolism compared to warfarin (HR 0.63 and HR 0.70, respectively).
Why the study?
NVAF is often accompanied by multiple comorbid conditions that increase risks and management complexity, prompting evaluation of stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding risks with NOACs versus warfarin.
Do NOACs reduce stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding compared to warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and multimorbidity?
Observational (n=155,959)
Yes
Do NOACs reduce stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding compared to warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and multimorbidity?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In patients with NVAF and high multimorbidity, NOACs have varying efficacy and safety profiles compared to warfarin, suggesting individualized selection is necessary.
INTRODUCTION: Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is often accompanied by multiple comorbid conditions, which increase the associated risks and complexity of patient management. This study evaluated the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (SE) and major bleeding (MB) among multimorbid patients with NVAF who were prescribed non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) or warfarin. METHODS: A retrospective study of patients with NVAF and high multimorbidity who initiated apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin from 1 January 2013 to 30 September 2015 was conducted using five insurance claims databases. Multimorbidity was defined as six or more comorbid conditions, and 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted between the NOAC-warfarin and NOAC-NOAC cohorts. Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the hazard ratios of stroke/SE and MB. RESULTS: Of the NVAF population (n = 466,991), 33.4% (n = 155,959) had multimorbidity, including 36,921 apixaban, 10,248 dabigatran, 45,509 rivaroxaban, and 63,281 warfarin patients. Compared to warfarin, apixaban and rivaroxaban were associated with a lower risk of stroke/SE (hazard ratio [HR] 0.63, 95% CI 0.54-0.74; HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.64-0.77, respectively). Apixaban and dabigatran were associated with a lower risk of MB (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.56-0.67; HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.66-0.86, respectively) and rivaroxaban was associated with a higher risk of MB (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01-1.12) compared to warfarin. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with NVAF and six or more comorbid conditions, NOACs were associated with varying risk of stroke/SE and MB compared to warfarin and to each other. Rather than a "one drug fits all" approach, our results may be useful for appropriate OAC treatment for multimorbid patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deitelzweig et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation with Multimorbidity (n=155,959). Apixaban vs. Warfarin was evaluated on Time to first stroke or systemic embolism (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.54-0.74). Among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and six or more comorbidities, apixaban and rivaroxaban were associated with a lower risk of stroke or systemic embolism compared to warfarin (HR 0.63 and HR 0.70, respectively).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: