PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 13, 2026Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society6 citationsOpen Access

The Complexity of Conjugacy, Orbit Equivalence, and von Neumann Equivalence of Actions of Nonamenable Groups

EGEusebio GardellaMLMartino Lupini

Key Points

  • This research investigates the complexities of conjugacy, orbit equivalence, and von Neumann equivalence among nonamenable groups' actions on probability spaces.
  • Analyzed free, ergodic, measure-preserving actions of nonamenable groups on standard atomless probability space.
  • Studied ergodic class-bijective extensions of equivalence relations.
  • Derived results using classical theorems regarding amenable and nonamenable groups.
  • Conjugacy, orbit equivalence, and von Neumann equivalence relations of free actions are not Borel for nonamenable groups.
  • Conjugacy problem in ergodic theory is resolved for nonamenable cases, establishing a dichotomy with amenable cases.
  • If equivalence relation is amenable, all extensions remain amenable and consequently isomorphic.

Abstract

Let Γ be a nonamenable countable, discrete group. Building on work of Popa, Ioana, and Moroz (formerly Epstein) –Törnquist, we show that the relations of conjugacy, orbit equivalence, and von Neumann equivalence of free, ergodic (or weak mixing) measure preserving actions of Γ on the standard atomless probability space are not Borel. This answers questions of Kechris, and is an optimal and definitive result which establishes a neat dichotomy with the amenable case. Indeed, classical results of Dye and Ornstein–Weiss imply that any two free, ergodic actions of an amenable group on the standard atomless probability space are orbit equivalent. The statement about conjugacy solves the nonamenable case of Halmos’ conjugacy problem in Ergodic Theory, originally posed in 1956 for ergodic transformations. In order to obtain these results, we study ergodic (or weakly mixing) class-bijective extensions of a given ergodic countable probability measure preserving equivalence relation R R. When R R is nonamenable, we show that the relations of isomorphism and von Neumann equivalence of extensions of R R are not Borel. On the other hand, if R R is amenable then all the extensions of R R are again amenable, and hence isomorphic by classical results of Dye and Connes–Feldman–Weiss. This approach allows us to extend the results about group actions mentioned above to the case of nonamenable locally compact unimodular groups, via the study of their cross-section equivalence relations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gardella et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a547f6d475c38bf615a5078https://doi.org/10.1090/memo/1638
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper