Demonstrates operator convergence in Hilbert spaces, with implications for large-q behaviours in geometry.
The companion paper establishes that the admissible fibre Fₙ carries the structure of the Weil representation V_ρ of Heis₃(Z/qZ) on L²(Z/qZ) (Foundation Theorem 5.6). The relationship between this discrete structure and continuous spacetime geometry in the large-q limit is identified as open in Foundation Remark 3.6. The present paper reduces this problem to a uniform coercivity estimate and a spectral tightness condition, and provides strong numerical evidence that the tightness condition holds. We formulate the large-q limit in the category of Hilbert spaces and operator algebras — not in the category of sets — and decompose it into three convergences: a Hilbert inductive limit (T1), a representational convergence of Weil generators to metaplectic generators (T2), and a Mosco convergence of admissibility forms to a second-order operator L_Π on L²(R) (T3). Conditions (1) and (3Y) of the embedding hypothesis [H1] are proved for the sinc embedding; [H1] is not needed in full generality: it holds in the admissible low-frequency regime relevant to T1–T3. Each result is stated with explicit hypotheses and proof status. The central remaining condition — Mosco tightness (Conjecture C, equivalently: spectral mass does not escape to high frequencies under admissibility constraints) — is formulated precisely, reduced to a Nash inequality programme, and confirmed quantitatively: for all tested primes q ∈ \29, 61, 101, 151\, the spectral tail mass of admissible test vectors satisfies Eq(q/3)/\|fq\|² < 2.1 × 10⁻⁵, with values decreasing toward machine precision as q grows. The continuum limit is shown to be a forced consequence of admissibility and spectral stability, not an additional assumption. The four-dimensional effective geometry and the Lorentzian signature are established in the companion paper Q5b.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jérôme Beau (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: