In-vitro study evaluates the effect of veneer thickness on bond conversion in dental materials, suggesting optimal choices.
Introduction: This study evaluated the influence of lithium disilicate restoration thickness on the degree of conversion (DC) of a self-adhesive dual-cured resin cement (Bifix SE®; VOCO GmbH, Cuxhaven, Germany) and a preheated composite resin (VisCalor Bulk®; VOCO GmbH, Cuxhaven, Germany). Methods: Sixty IPS e.max CAD (LTB1) specimens (2 mm, 4 mm, 6 mm; n D 10 per group) were fabricated and divided into six groups. Groups 1–3 were luted with Bifix SE, and Groups 4–6 with preheated VisCalor Bulk. Specimens were conditioned with 5% hydro_uoric acid and silane, then cemented and light cured. Raman spectroscopy was used to determine DC. Results: Two-way ANOVA showed ceramic thickness significantly reduced DC% (F(2,54) D 17.053, p < 0.001), and luting agent type was also significant (F(1,54) D 360.679, p < 0.001), with VisCalor Bulk achieving higher DC than Bifix SE at all thicknesses. Conclusions: Increasing lithium disilicate thickness negatively affected polymerization. Preheated VisCalor Bulk performed better, making it preferable under thicker ceramic restorations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kanaan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: