Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
July 13, 2026International Arab Journal of Dentistry

Comparison of Three Intraoral scanners for Digital impressions of Biologically Oriented Preparation: An In-vivo Study////Comparaison de Trois Scanners Intra-Oraux pour les Empreintes Numériques de Préparation à Orientation Biologique : Une Etude In-vivo

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

LHLara HabliPHPascale Habre‐HallageHTHani Tohmé

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Randomized trial evaluates accuracy of digital impressions in maxillary incisor preparations, suggesting clinical viability of three scanners.

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of digital impressions obtained with three intraoral scanners for Biologically Oriented Preparation Technique.
  • Forty-two scans were recorded with Trios 3, Sirios, and Helios 680 intraoral scanners.
  • Accuracy was assessed using Geomagic Control X by calculating 3D surface deviation.
  • Data normality and accuracy were evaluated with Shapiro–Wilk, Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests, and one-way ANOVA.
  • Sirios demonstrated the highest trueness but was statistically insignificant (p < 0.05).
  • All scanners achieved clinically acceptable trueness for full preparations.
  • Precision across the scanners was found to be similar.

Cite This Study

Habli et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a548105475c38bf615a569dhttps://doi.org/10.65314/2218-0885.1916
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share