Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review assesses AI's effectiveness in diagnosing craniofacial deformities without ionizing radiation, suggesting improved safety.
Introduction: Craniofacial deformities, like craniosynostosis and plagiocephaly, require early diagnosis, but traditional methods like CT scans use harmful ionizing radiation. Artificial Intelligence (AI) offers a non-invasive, radiation-free alternative, using 2D and 3D imaging for accurate diagnosis, improving safety and accessibility, especially in remote areas. Objective: This review evaluates the use of AI in diagnosing craniofacial deformities without ionizing radiation, focusing on its strengths, limitations, and challenges in clinical implementation. Methods: The literature was searched across five databases—PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Wiley, and Cochrane—over the last decade, following PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria were AI-based, non-invasive imaging techniques for craniofacial deformities. The analysis reviewed diagnostic methods, accuracy, types of deformities, data sources, risk of bias, and external validity. Results: Of 166 articles, 12 met the inclusion criteria and involved over 5,000 individuals. AI diagnostic accuracy ranged from 70.2% to 99.5%. Machine learning methods using 2D and 3D images effectively diagnosed conditions like craniosynostosis and plagiocephaly without ionizing radiation exposure. Conclusion: AI provides a safe, effective method for diagnosing craniofacial deformities without ionizing radiation. Further research and Development are necessary for wider clinical adoption.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mutmainnah et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: