Shows structural tension in the capacity decay exponent in charged-lepton mass ratios, suggesting measurement improvements are needed.
The O3–O7 derivation chain establishes the structural relation β* = 1/(δ + 1/2) linking the capacity decay exponent δ to the cascade growth exponent β* governing charged-lepton mass ratios. Papers O12–O14 demonstrated that the exact Weil-block capacity exponent δ̂exact(q) ∈ [3.6, 4.8] is incompatible with the target window δ ∈ [7.4, 10.6], and that this tension is structural rather than a finite-size artefact. The present paper identifies the precise origin of the mismatch: the O6 growth equation dp/dn Rₙ \, cBI √p(n) derives β* from a scalar global redundancy functional Rₙ, whereas the exact observable measured in O12–O13 is a block-averaged capacity over $(q-1)$ Weil representations of internal dimension q. We prove a non-equivalence theorem establishing that the block-averaged exponent δ̂exact does not, in general, coincide with the scalar exponent α entering the growth equation. We define the effective dynamical redundancy Rₙᵉᶠᶠ as the observable that genuinely governs the valence growth in the exact-block setting, and re-derive the growth equation with this observable as input. The re-derivation yields two structural scenarios: (C1) the functional form β* = 1/(δeff + 1/2) survives with a corrected exponent δeff that differs from δ̂exact by an aggregation bias; (C2) the functional form itself is modified by a representation-dimension correction, β* = 1/(δeff + 1/2 + σ(q)), where σ(q) → 0 as q → ∞. Scenario discrimination requires a block-level redundancy measurement not yet available from the O12 pipeline, identified as the central open direction of this paper.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jérôme Beau (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: