Prospective observational study examines fetal hemoglobin and tissue oxygenation in neonates, indicating potential impacts on health.
Introduction Physiological postnatal changes in fetal hemoglobin fraction (FHbF) may affect neonatal tissue oxygenation through shifts in the oxyhemoglobin dissociation curve. We examined cross-sectional associations between FHbF and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS)-derived tissue oxygenation, and longitudinal associations between within-infant changes in FHbF and cerebral tissue oxygenation (cStO₂) and oxygen extraction (cFTOE) during the first 3 postnatal weeks in neonates without red blood cell transfusions. Methods This prospective observational study included 25 preterm (median [IQR] gestational age 33.6 [1.6] weeks) and 25 term (39.9 [1.4] weeks) neonates in a tertiary-center neonatal unit. Measurements were performed at T1 (days 2–3), T2 (days 5–10), and T3 (days 12–18). cStO₂ was assessed by time-resolved NIRS, peripheral tissue oxygenation by spatially resolved NIRS and peripheral fractional oxygen extraction by venous occlusion. cFTOE was calculated. Total hemoglobin (Hb) and FHbF were measured by co-oximetry. Cross-sectional associations were assessed using Spearman’s rho correlations. Longitudinal trajectories and gestational-age-adjusted within-infant change-on-change associations were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models. Results No significant cross-sectional correlations were identified between FHbF and cerebral or peripheral NIRS-derived variables at any time point. Over time, Hb and cStO₂ declined, cFTOE increased, while peripheral oxygenation and extraction remained stable. Within-infant Hb changes were not associated with concurrent cerebral NIRS changes. In contrast, FHbF change was associated with change in cStO₂ (T2–T1: β per 1% FHbF, −0.19; 95% CI −0.33 to −0.05) and cFTOE (β 0.22; 95% CI 0.06 to 0.38). Conclusion Within-infant FHbF decline was associated with increased cStO₂ and decreased cFTOE, independent of total Hb.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suppan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: