Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Study improves fluid flow modeling accuracy in porous materials, suggesting enhanced simulation reliability.
Numerical modeling based on the 3D X-ray microtomography data is a cornerstone for comprehending fluid transport dynamics in porous materials. However, inaccuracies in image processing and pore morphology delineation introduce significant errors into the simulation outcomes. In this study, we introduce a deep reinforcement learning (DRL)-based framework designed to refine pore morphology by accurately unveiling under-resolution, micro-links, and complex pore boundaries. The framework uses a smart agent and its action space to iteratively adjust the pore space morphology via targeted morphological operations. This process is dynamically guided by a reward function that minimizes deviations between simulation results and corresponding experimental measurements. The framework operates using three distinct simulation modalities: Pore Network Modeling (PNM), a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), or a hybrid algorithm. The CNN, trained on 1,176 3D images sourced from 21 unique rock samples, achieves a dramatic reduction in PNM computational time from 134 to 0.44 seconds per step. Crucially, the hybrid algorithm intelligently leverages PNM and CNN interchangeably to optimize the trade-off between computational expense and predictive accuracy. Evaluation on a carbonate sample demonstrated unprecedented improvements: permeability error was reduced from 32.16% (base PNM) to 0.79%, and effective porosity error from 40% to 0.32%. Furthermore, for a tight sandstone sample, the framework established fluid flow paths, increasing computed permeability from zero to 0.52 millidarcy (experimental value: 0.104 millidarcy). These results demonstrate this framework's ability to systematically refine pore morphology and revolutionize simulation accuracy, offering transformative potential for applications in hydrology, CO 2 sequestration, and subsurface energy storage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mahdaviara et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: