Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article investigates how ‘populism’ was used in public discussions during the COVID-19 outbreak. It argues that the indiscriminate use of ‘populism’ and its association with the pandemic is rooted in the negative way it is talked about in public debates. Critically evaluating pundit claims framing populism as an ‘anti-scientific’, ‘irresponsible’ and ‘authoritarian’ response to the health crisis, this article shows that ‘populism’ does not suffice to explain actors’ responses to COVID-19. Rather, populists’ ideological positions played a crucial role in their pandemic politics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Galanopoulos et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: