Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging guidelines and clinical applications were established in the 2010 ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR expert consensus document.
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 0%
Robert A. Harrington, MD, FACC, FAHA, Chair Jeffrey L. Anderson, MD, FACC, FAHA††1 Eric R. Bates, MD, FACC Charles R. Bridges, MD, MPH, FACC, FAHA Mark J. Eisenberg, MD, MPH, FACC, FAHA Victor A. Ferrari, MD, FACC, FAHA Cindy L. Grines, MD, FACC††1 Mark A. Hlatky, MD, FACC,
“A criticism of the document is its tendency to present applications with less widespread use with the same level of enthusiasm as areas where CMR has widespread utility. These areas include the use of CMR for assessment of coronary atherosclerotic disease. Although CMR is widely used for determination of anomalous origin of the coronary arteries, there are relatively few centers where coronary CMR is performed, and considerable research needs to be done before coronary artery MRI is a reasonable tool for the complete evaluation of the coronary arteries and accurate assessment of coronary artery bypass graft status.”
Hundley et al. (Tue,) reported a other. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging guidelines and clinical applications were established in the 2010 ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR expert consensus document.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: