Legal analysis critiques US arms export laws' failure to enforce human rights, proposing reforms.
The United States is the world's largest arms exporter and a professed champion of international human rights. This article identifies a critical analytical gap: the arms transfer legal framework—the Leahy Laws, Section 502B of the Foreign Assistance Act, and the Arms Export Control Act—is architecturally designed to produce the appearance of human rights conditionality while preserving executive discretion to transfer weapons regardless of rights violations. Through legal analysis, historical case studies of Yemen and Gaza, and institutional critique, this article demonstrates that non-enforcement is a structural design feature, not a malfunction, and proposes a framework for genuine reform.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zaid Mustafa Alvi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: