Key result
ECG-detected RAD or RVH is linked to ~2-fold higher odds of echocardiographic pulmonary hypertension.
Why the study?
The relationship between machine-reported ECG findings suggesting right-heart strain and echocardiographic pulmonary hypertension phenotypes or right-heart abnormalities remains incompletely defined.
Does machine-reported right axis deviation or right ventricular hypertrophy on ECG predict echocardiographic pulmonary hypertension phenotypes and right-heart abnormalities in hospitalized patients?
Observational (n=42,078)
No
Does machine-reported right axis deviation or right ventricular hypertrophy on ECG predict echocardiographic pulmonary hypertension phenotypes and right-heart abnormalities in hospitalized patients?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Machine-reported right axis deviation or right ventricular hypertrophy on routine ECG is a highly specific but insensitive marker for echocardiographic pulmonary hypertension and right-heart abnormalities, serving as a supportive clue but inadequate for ruling out disease.
PURPOSE: Machine-reported electrocardiographic findings suggesting right-heart strain are routinely generated during electrocardiogram (ECG) acquisition, but their relationship to echocardiographic pulmonary hypertension phenotypes and right-heart abnormalities remains incompletely defined. This study evaluated whether machine-reported right axis deviation (RAD) or right ventricular hypertrophy (RVH) is associated with echocardiographic pulmonary hypertension phenotypes and right-heart abnormalities in hospitalized patients. METHODS: This retrospective observational study used linked MIMIC-IV-ECG and MIMIC-IV-ECHO data. Echocardiograms were linked to the closest ECG obtained from 7 days before echocardiography through the time of echocardiography. The primary exposure was machine-reported RAD or RVH. The primary outcome was Echo-PH specific, a composite echo-derived phenotype including tricuspid regurgitation velocity greater than 3.4 m/s, moderate or severe pulmonary hypertension text, or right ventricular pressure overload. Logistic regression adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, and ICU status, with patient-level cluster-robust standard errors. RESULTS: The cohort included 68 905 ECG-echocardiography pairs from 42 078 patients; 2815 pairs were RAD/RVH-positive. For Echo-PH specific, RAD/RVH had sensitivity 7.5%, specificity 96.7%, positive predictive value 35.5%, and negative predictive value 81.4%. RAD/RVH remained associated with Echo-PH specific after full adjustment using cluster-robust standard errors (odds ratio, 2.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.84-2.26). The adjusted probability of Echo-PH specific was 18.8% without RAD/RVH and 30.0% with RAD/RVH. CONCLUSION: Machine-reported ECG RAD/RVH was highly specific but insensitive for echocardiographic pulmonary hypertension phenotypes and right-heart abnormalities. These routine ECG findings may serve as supportive clues to echocardiographic right-heart disease but should not be used to exclude it.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoshihiro Fuchigami (2026) conducted an observational in Echocardiographic pulmonary hypertension phenotypes and right-heart abnormalities (n=42,078). Machine-reported right axis deviation (RAD) or right ventricular hypertrophy (RVH) vs. Absence of machine-reported RAD or RVH was evaluated on Echo-PH specific (composite of tricuspid regurgitation velocity >3.4 m/s, moderate/severe pulmonary hypertension text, or right ventricular pressure overload) (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.84-2.26, p=<0.001). Machine-reported right axis deviation or right ventricular hypertrophy on routine ECG was associated with echocardiographic pulmonary hypertension phenotypes (OR 2.04) but demonstrated low sensitivity (7.5%) and high specificity (96.7%).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: