Key result
Active commuting to school shows no association with ectopic fat or cardiometabolic risk vs passive commuting.
Why the study?
Active commuting to and from school is linked to favourable body composition, but its association with specific ectopic fat depots remains unclear in paediatric populations.
Does active commuting to school improve specific fat depots and cardiometabolic risk factors in children compared to passive commuting?
Cross-Sectional (n=174)
Does active commuting to school improve specific fat depots and cardiometabolic risk factors in children compared to passive commuting?
Active commuting to school, primarily by walking, is not associated with significant differences in ectopic fat depots or cardiometabolic risk factors in children.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No cardiometabolic benefit tied to active commuting in this pediatric cohort; leaves open its role and requires prospective confirmation.
Background Active commuting to and from school (ACS) is a feasible strategy to increase daily physical activity in children. Although ACS has been associated with favourable body composition and selected cardiometabolic markers, its association with specific ectopic fat depots remains unclear in paediatric populations. Objective To examine differences in specific fat depots and cardiometabolic risk factors between children who actively and passively commute to school. Methods Cross‐sectional baseline data from 174 children (48.9% girls; mean age 10.8 ± 1.4 years) participating in the EFIGRO and MICROKID projects were analysed. ACS mode was self‐reported using a validated questionnaire and classified as active or passive. Visceral adipose tissue, abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue, intermuscular abdominal adipose tissue, hepatic fat, intrapancreatic fat, and lumbar spine marrow fat were assessed using magnetic resonance imaging. Cardiometabolic risk factors included blood pressure, triglycerides, high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol, glucose, insulin, and insulin resistance estimated by the homeostasis model assessment. Results No significant differences were observed between active and passive commuters for any fat depot (all p ≥ 0.150) or cardiometabolic risk factors, including insulin resistance and the overall cardiometabolic risk score (all p ≥ 0.220). Conclusions Active commuting to/from school was not associated with differences in ectopic fat depots, cardiometabolic risk factors, or insulin resistance in children.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rodriguez-Sanchez et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Normal weight to obesity (n=174). Active commuting to and from school vs. Passive commuting to and from school was evaluated on Differences in specific ectopic fat depots and cardiometabolic risk factors (p=≥0.150). Active commuting to and from school was not associated with significant differences in ectopic fat depots, cardiometabolic risk factors, or insulin resistance compared to passive commuting.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: