Cultural-heritage monitoring increasingly requires evidence-to-decision architecture capable of moving beyond descriptive coherence maps toward analytically transparent and verification-oriented decision support. Within this evidential setting, the analysis presents a case-study-demonstrated architecture for multi-epoch Sentinel-1 interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) coherence analysis in a heritage-sensitive landscape, designed to transform heterogeneous pairwise outputs into an interpretable, cross-epoch comparable, sector-level evidence register. Quantitatively, the architecture is demonstrated on 12 short-baseline intervals and 1193 valid fixed-support points; it is organized around four linked operations: (i) reliability-filtered coherence stabilization through fixed-support sampling, temporal point-history construction, ECDF-based rank alignment, and ordinal recoding; (ii) separation of the continuous radar response from the upstream four-state ordinal monitoring-support register before model fitting; (iii) leakage-controlled TabICLv2 learning on RAW/stabilized radar-meteorological descriptors, excluding SHAP-derived, prediction-derived, probability-derived, feature-importance-derived, and global mean-coherence proxy variables; and (iv) post hoc SHAP attribution transferred to a three-horizon DEMATEL prioritization register. Under the retained TabICLv2 configuration, holdout evaluation showed strong ordinal separability: accuracy = 0.9799, balanced accuracy = 0.9798, macro-F1 = 0.9798, and Cohen’s kappa = 0.9699. To delimit the performance claim, the corresponding holdout confusion matrix contained three observed ordinal labels after filtering and split construction; support was balanced across State 0, State 1, and State 2. At the decision-transfer stage, the SHAP-informed DEMATEL synthesis distinguished three prioritization regimes: an immediate coherence-led H1 structure, a seasonal hydro-meteorological amplification regime in H2, and a strategic coherence-selective prioritization structure in H3. The study is framed as a methodological demonstration for persistence-aware, verification-oriented heritage monitoring, not as field validation, archeological confirmation, structural diagnosis, or causal physical inference.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Polverino et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: