Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) is an analog of graphite due to its unique electronic structure. g-C3N4 based materials have been used in photocatalytic applications. However, pure g-C3N4 suffers from major shortcomings which include poor disparity, low surface area and a high recombination rate of photo generated electron-hole pairs that significantly reduce its photocatalytic activity. In this work, self-assembly of g-C3N4 sheet into rod shaped g-C3N4 was developed via a simple polymerisation method. A composite made of g-C3N4 nanorods and rGO (rGO-RCN) was also prepared. The band gap g-C3N4 was shifted from 2.77 to 2.6 eV evidented by UV-DRS data. As a result, rGO-RCN showed a relatively high absorption in the visible region. Moreover, a fast electron transfer rate was observed with rGO-RCN composite as conformed from PL analysis and photocurrent measurement. The formation of nanorod and sheet morphologies was confirmed via TEM analysis. The photocatalytic activities of prepared sheet-g-C3N4 (SCN), Rod g-C3N4 (RCN), reduced graphene oxide supported sheet-g-C3N4 (rGO-SCN) and reduced graphene oxide supported Rod-g-C3N4 (rGO-RCN) were evaluated using a commonly used antibiotic (tetracycline). Among these catalysts, rGO-RCN nanocomposite showed sonophotocatalytic activity 3 times higher compared to pure g-C3N4. This superior sonophotocatalytic activity could be due to enhanced visible light absorption of the material, active sites generated by ultrasound, and the high electron transport property of rGO.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vinesh et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: