Quantifying intergenerational changes in educational homophily is challenging when education level of marriageable individuals is generation-specific. To address this challenge, the literature proposed various indicators. We argue that suitable indicators should meet several analytical criteria. However, our main criterion is empirical in nature: suitable indicators, when computed from data on American couples born after 1930, should exhibit a U-shaped trend at the national level and for the majority of the US states. A cardinal homophily indicator constructed with the NM-method, based on an old forgotten and recently reinvented ordinal indicator, is one of the few indicators that meets the criteria.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anna Naszódi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: