Efficacy and Safety of Low or Reduced Dose Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Following Left Atrial Appendage Closure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of low-dose direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients undergoing left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus, up to August 12, 2024. Studies comparing low-dose DOACs with DAPT in post-LAAC patients were included. The primary outcomes of interest were thromboembolic events, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality. Four studies, including two randomized controlled trials and two observational studies, met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 828 patients (319 in the DOAC group and 509 in the DAPT group). The meta-analysis revealed that patients treated with DOACs had a significantly lower risk of thromboembolic events compared to those receiving DAPT. DOACs were also associated with a significantly reduced risk of device-related thrombosis. Although the risk of stroke was lower in the DOAC group, the difference was not statistically significant. The risk of death did not differ significantly between the two groups. Regarding safety outcomes, patients receiving DOACs experienced fewer bleeding events compared to those on DAPT, with the difference being statistically significant. However, high heterogeneity was reported among the study results for bleeding events. These findings suggest that low-dose DOACs may be a more effective and safer alternative to DAPT for post-LAAC antithrombotic management, particularly in patients at high risk for both thromboembolic and bleeding events. DOACs demonstrated superior efficacy in reducing the risk of stroke, systemic embolism, and other thrombotic complications, while also minimizing bleeding risks.