Key result
Bayesian-augmented neural network surrogates improve cardiac stiffness estimation and cut training time versus simple regression.
Why the study?
Surrogate models accelerate parameter estimation for complex cardiac models, but introduce approximation errors that can cause bias or overconfidence if neglected.
A Bayesian approximation error framework improves the accuracy and efficiency of surrogate-based parameter estimation for cardiac mechanics digital twins.
May improve cardiac digital twin parameter estimation; leaves open clinical validation before practice impact.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Parameter estimation for complex physics-based cardiac models is computationally demanding. Surrogate models can be used to speed up model evaluations and improve the feasibility of estimation and uncertainty quantification. However, the use of surrogates introduces additional sources of error that, if neglected, can cause bias or overconfidence in inferences. Here, we present a general approach to account for such model errors when carrying out surrogate-based parameter estimation and uncertainty quantification. METHODS: We use the Bayesian approximation error approach to develop a general framework that systematically accounts for modelling errors and uncertainties induced from the use of a surrogate model. We detail and implement this approach for the task of estimating cardiac stiffness from in-silico 3D left ventricle passive deformation data. We use a finite element model of cardiac mechanics with a neural network-based surrogate, and compare the results with those obtained from a simple regression approach. RESULTS: We show that, despite the sophistication of the neural network, neglecting model errors in the estimation stage leads to biased and overconfident estimates. We demonstrate that our proposed framework allows for simple model-error corrections that provide substantially better inferences. We also demonstrate that our approach can decrease the required number of forward simulations and computational cost for training a neural network by augmenting a low-complexity neural network with a Bayesian approximation error model. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a framework for augmenting surrogate models that improves inference and decreases training time. This has potential for use in the clinical estimation of cardiac stiffness as a biomarker of disease, where efficiency is required at the point of care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Argus et al. (2026) studied Cardiac mechanics modeling. Bayesian approximation error approach vs. Simple regression approach was evaluated on Estimation of cardiac stiffness from in-silico 3D left ventricle passive deformation data. Augmenting a neural network surrogate with a Bayesian approximation error model corrected model errors, improved inference of cardiac stiffness, and decreased training time compared to simple regression.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: