Focused update reviews the link between brace non-adherence and relapse after Ponseti treatment for clubfoot, suggesting key factors to improve care.
Brace non-adherence remains a vulnerable component of Ponseti treatment for idiopathic clubfoot and is closely linked to relapse after correction. This focused, updated scoping review aimed to synthesize recent relapse-relevant evidence and clarify its added value beyond the 2024 scoping review by Paterson et al. Paterson et al. was used as the pre-update anchor through 16 June 16, 2022. A focused update from 17 June 2022 to 1 May 2026 used PubMed/MEDLINE, Europe PMC, PEDro, Cochrane Library checks, ClinicalTrials.gov, citation searching, and accessible grey-literature sources. Searches combined controlled vocabulary and free-text terms for clubfoot/clubfeet, Ponseti treatment, brace terminology, adherence, relapse, cost/access, and care organization. The anchor review included 42 studies. The focused update retained 19 empirical studies and six contextual or grey-literature items. Evidence supported six domains: adherence-relapse association, brace type and tolerance, cost/transport/access, insurance or public-service variables, specialized clubfoot teams, and contextual differences between high-income and lower-resource settings. Missed visits, brace interruption, transportation burden, caregiver understanding, and continuity of care were repeatedly associated with relapse-related outcomes. Brace non-adherence should be approached as a modifiable pathway shaped by families, brace tolerance, access burden, and care organization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arvati et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: