Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Study investigates rainfall patterns in southern Italy, revealing local factors influencing DDF curve variability.
Accurate estimation of depth–duration–frequency (DDF) curves is essential for hydrological analyses and flood-risk mitigation. Regionalization methods are particularly important in areas with limited observations, but their performance may deteriorate where topography and climate generate strong spatial variability. This study investigates the Gargano promontory in southern Italy, an area that is commonly treated as a single hydrologically homogeneous zone despite its marked morphological and climatic contrasts. Annual maximum rainfall data from eight rain gauges, together with topographic and climatic descriptors, were analyzed to assess whether local factors help explain the variability of DDF-curve parameters. The analysis focused on elevation, distance from the sea, and a wind-effect index derived from a digital elevation model. The results indicate that the regional behavior of extreme rainfall is not spatially uniform and that several DDF-curve parameters are influenced by local physiographic controls. Different controls emerge for different station groups, and a physiographically based subdivision of the Gargano promontory into windward and leeward sectors provides a more coherent representation of DDF-curve parameters than the currently adopted single-zone regionalization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iemmolo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: