Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Computational hypothesis explores IgE-independent mast-cell activation by food and pollen allergens, suggesting novel mechanisms.
Background: Some food and pollen allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis disproportionate to IgE titres, are not fully explained by IgE-mediated mechanisms. MRGPRX2, a polyspecific sensor of cationic ligands, mediates IgE-independent mast-cell degranulation and requires a salt bridge to aspartate D184. Whether protein allergens can adopt D184-engaging poses is unknown. Methods: Eleven peach, cedar pollen, peanut, birch and yam allergens were docked against the experimental MRGPRX2 cryo-EM structure (PDB 7VV6) with HADDOCK3 under three protocols. Three agonists calibrated a D184 salt-bridge consistency threshold, four size-matched non-allergen proteins probed the determinants of engagement, and in silico mutagenesis tested D184 dependence. Results: Five allergens met a HIGH-consistency threshold (≥2/3): Pru p 7, Cry j 7, Cry j 1, Pru p 3 and Ara h 6; Ara h 2 was MODERATE, and mature-chain Cry j 2 did not engage D184. Engagement was charge-driven yet determined by a single accessible residue rather than net charge: HADDOCK score tracked the electrostatic term (ρ = 0.84) but not molecular weight (ρ = 0.36), the net-acidic Ara h 6 engaged through ARG4 while the net-neutral ubiquitin did not, and D184A abolished the salt bridge. Accordingly, size-matched non-allergen proteins presenting a surface lysine/arginine (ribonuclease A, carbonic anhydrase II) also formed genuine D184 salt bridges, whereas the acidic maltose-binding protein did not. Conclusions: Allergens presenting an accessible surface lysine or arginine can form the MRGPRX2 D184 salt bridge in agonist-like geometry, but engagement is governed by local cationic-residue accessibility rather than net charge or allergen identity — non-allergen proteins engage equally — so docking alone establishes neither specificity nor binding affinity, receptor activation or clinical relevance. We propose a charge-based, exposure-gated hypothesis for experimental and clinical validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suzuki et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: